(London Post) For the euroskeptics who launched the Dutch referendum, the vote is more about getting “democracy” in the EU rather than the Ukraine deal itself. Are they going to succeed?
It’s about Europe, not Ukraine
“It is important for people to vote, because for the first time, we can say if we agree or don’t agree with things that are going on in Europe,” says René. To him, the association agreement between EU and Ukraine is not really the central matter. Even if it says so on the ballot papers. It is rather about getting the voices of the Dutch people to be heard in Brussels, and bringing more democracy into EU decision-making.
The initiative is a joint venture from the popular right-wing Dutch blog “GeenStilj” and two euroskeptic organizations. Last year, it surprisingly drummed up more than 400,000 signatures and thus forced the Netherlands to hold this so-called advisory referendum, meaning that it is not binding.
Dutch citizens will now have to decide whether they agree with the Ukraine-EU treaty, which enables tighter economic and political cooperation between the two sides. Euroskeptics, including René, denounce the “undemocratic” decision process leading to the agreement. For them, the agreement is also a step for further EU expansion. Some of them also argue that the deal could cost the Dutch taxpayers billions of euros. But the goal of René today is to get the people vote.
We need to help Ukraine
On the other hand, the Dutch government is clearly in favor of the treaty. Over the weekend, dozens of politicians gathered at the infamous “Dam Square,” right in the historical center of Amsterdam, to campaign for the treaty. They drew a crowd of 200 people, many of them supporters of their political parties. A big crowd of people in front of the stage dressed in green, held up flags and posters with “Green Links” and “yes” slogans.
“Ukraine, a country that has long been influenced by the Soviet Union, now would like to become a more democratic country. We should help them,” says a supporter in the crowd, while the politicians are speaking on the stage. For him and many others, who are in favor of the association agreement, it is important to help Ukraine to develop democracy, fight corruption and shift the country away from Russian influence. “For the Dutch citizens, the association agreement may not matter much, but it means a lot to Ukraine,” another supporter, dressed in green, added.
“They abuse the referendum”
Many in the yes-camp argue that the Netherlands are going to benefit economically because of exports and trade. To them, the true reason for calling a referendum is for the activists to demonstrate their disappointment towards the Dutch government and the EU: “I am worried that in the future, other debates will also become populist, anti-EU, where the real issues will not be discussed,” says Daan Brouwer, a young Dutch student holding a large “vote yes” poster. To a certain extent, he agrees that euroskepticism is on the rise and that the Dutch people are feeling a democratic deficit in the EU. “But that is not the point here. If we vote no, all sacrifices Ukraine has made would have been for nothing.”
A fear that is shared by Sybrand Buma, leader of the Christian Democratic party (CDA), who gave a speech on the event. He believed that the europskeptics are instrumentalizing the referendum: “The people who made this referendum possible were very naïve, thinking that we would have rational debates,” Buma told DW, as he was resting next to the stage. “But these are the ones who feel abandoned by politics, and this is a big problem. A referendum like this is always used to say ‘no,’ whatever the question is”.
The CDA politician was also worried that the position of the Netherlands in the EU will be affected, if the citizens vote “no”. And although the outcome is non-binding, the government in Den Haag could not ignore its citizens’ will. Futhermore, a no-vote would lower their credibility.
Farage hopes for push for Brexit campaign
The no-campaign in Volendam has gained prominent support from the UK. In a small seaside hotel , Nigel Farage, the leader of the UK Independence Party, is waiting in a lounge to deliver his speech on the referendum. He thinks that the treaty is largely a political act. “Everyone knows that the Ukraine deal is not about trade. This is a precursor to a visa-free travel until the end of the year, and also letting them to become members of the EU,” Farage tells DW.
“I’m very concerned that the EU […] is playing political games and seeking expansion. Those involved in that, who are waving European flags […] tell me this is a project about peace? I doubt that.” As a supporter of Brexit, he thinks that the euroskeptics in the Netherlands might not yet want to leave the EU, but they want to express their views and bring about changes. “If governments become scared of their electorates, then Brussels will start to behave differently. ”
Nigel Farage received a warm welcome when it was finally his turn to speak at the event. “Who supports Brexit?” the moderator asks the crowd of supporters. Everybody in the hall raises theirs hands and they clap enthusiastically when Farage delivers his set piece about Europe and democracy.
Activist René van Leeuwen and his friends have come to hear the British EU parliamentarian. He feels proud being part of the crowd who initiated the referendum. “The signatures are just from ordinary people like you and me, who want more influence in our democracy. It has never been done before in history,” says René. No matter how the result turns out, he hopes that the Dutch people will use a referendum as a tool more often. “I hope the next one will be about TTIP.”